Archive for January 2014

Only 37% of Naturalized Citizens Believe That the U.S. Constitution Supersedes International Law

A vitally important study by Phyllis Schlafly – Amnesty Is Republican Party Suicide – proving that most non-native born Americans don’t support U.S. sovereignty. 2/3rds of them, the ones John Boehner’s GOP want to legalize, say international law supersedes the U.S. Constitution.

This is truly frightening. It means that if amnesty is granted the character of the nation will be changed forever.

…An enormous body of survey research shows that large majorities of recent immigrants, who are mostly Hispanic and Asian, hold liberal views on most policy issues and therefore vote Democratic two-to-one. Their motivation is not our immigration policy; it is economic issues.

The 2008 National Annenberg Election Survey found that 62 percent of immigrants prefer a single government-run health care system. The 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study found that 69 percent of immigrants support Obamacare, and the Pew Research Center found that 75 percent of Hispanic and 55 percent of Asian immigrants support bigger government.

A Harris poll found that 81 percent of native-born Americans believe the schools should teach students to be proud of being American, compared to only 50 percent of immigrants who had become naturalized U.S. citizens. Only 37 percent of naturalized citizens (compared to 67 percent of native-born citizens) think our Constitution has a higher legal authority than international law.

The Pew Research Center reported in 2011 that, of all groups surveyed, Hispanics have the most negative view of capitalism in America — 55 percent. This is even higher than the supporters of Occupy Wall Street…

The Second Amendment Tent And The Nose Of The Democrat Camel


Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walks about, seeking whom he may devour: 1 Peter 1:13

January 29, 2014 – Atlanta, GA – – The Georgia State Senate Judiciary Committee will soon hold a hearing on legislation that attacks the individual’s inherent right to self-defense.  Senate Bill 280, sponsored by State Senator Vincent Fort (D-39), would repeal an integral portion of Georgia’s self-defense law that allows an individual to defend themselves without a duty to retreat, putting their God-given and constitutional right to self-defense in jeopardy.

Sen. Fort was elected in 1996 and has been no stranger to controversy throughout his tenure in the state capital. In February 2010, Fort opposed a bill that would prevent Georgians from being forced to receive a microchip implant against their will, calling it “a solution in search of a problem.”

On October 26, 2011, Senator Fort was arrested along with 52 other members of Occupy Atlanta, in support of the protesters.

In 2014, Fort protested the appointment of a new executive director, Rebecca DeHart, for the Georgia Democratic Party because she is white. “When you have a chairman who is white and an executive director who is white,” Fort, the senate’s second-most senior member, told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, “that rich diversity is not reflected.”

Sen. Fort’s extreme liberal position as a legislator has been made abundantly clear. Therefore, can there be any question in the minds of normal people that SB 280 is inherently dangerous legislation? It appears to be the universal goal of the liberal left to empower violent criminals in their attacks on law-abiding citizens. Why should we as citizens be placed in fear of criminal prosecution when we stand our ground and defend ourselves? Why should we retreat from those places in which we have a legal right to be? This type of senseless and politically motivated legislation puts the rights of the criminal before the rights of a potential victim, and must be stopped.

In response, State Representative Rick Jasperse has introduced House Bill 875, perhaps the most comprehensive pro-gun reform legislation in recent state history.

HB 875 seeks to make many changes to benefit law-abiding gun owners, shooters and sportsmen alike.  Some of the key improvements and changes include:

  • Removal of fingerprinting for renewal of Weapons Carry Licenses (“WCL”).
  • Prohibiting the state from creating and maintaining a database of WCL holders.
  • Creation of an absolute defense for the legal use of deadly force in the face of a violent attack.
  • Removal of the sweeping restrictions on legally carrying a firearm with a WCL in churches and bars, leaving this decision to private property owners.
  • Lowering the age to obtain a concealed WCL for self-defense from 21 to 18 for active duty military, with specific training.
  • Repealing the unnecessary and duplicative state-required license for a firearms dealer, instead requiring only a Federal Firearms License (FFL).
  • Preempting a ban on firearms in public housing, ensuring that the right to self-defense should not be infringed based on where one calls home.
  • Codifying the ability to legally carry, with a WCL, in sterile/non-secure areas of airports.
  • Incorporation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act for mental health reporting.
  • Stating that under a declared state of emergency, all law-abiding gun owners will not have their Second Amendment rights restricted or infringed by executive authority through Emergency Powers protection.
  • Strengthening current firearms preemption statutes through further clarification of the regulatory authority of local governments, excluding firearm discharge ordinances.
  • Allowing school systems to decide whether staff and faculty may carry a firearm on school property, pending approved training, similar to the NRA’s National School Shield program.
  • Allowing the lawful carry by WCL holders in government buildings where it is not currently restricted or security screening personnel are posted during regular business hours.

Rick Jasperse’ bill represents the conservative interpretation of, “common sense firearms legislation” and is indicative of the mindset of the vast majority of Georgia’s population.

We must never forget that the civil rights era in the Deep-South, so maligned by the Democratic Party, was in fact a child of their own design and creation. Now, while the Devil walks about yet again, seeking whom he may devour, we must remain eternally vigilant to prevent history repeating itself.

©2014 GA Wolf. All rights reserved.

Sen Mike Lee’s Brutal Interrogation of Scarface Holder

This is archived at CSPAN, please note the beginning few frames, Holder gets armed security presence standing, in uniform w/sidearm, at front of committee room.

Cognitive Dissonance at the Wall Street Journal – The Establishment GOP Media & Political Class Will Never Get It

January 29, 2014 – San Francisco, CA – – We are going to be picking on the WSJ today, not because we have a special grudge against it, but because the thinking at that newspaper [part of the Murdoch publishing empire] displays a lot of the characteristics of what is terribly wrong with the political opposition to the Democrat Party, which is largely Marxist by way of ideological affiliation.

This morning, the Journal published a wonderful piece authored by Ted Cruz, a personal hero of ours. The topic, The Imperial Presidency of Barack Obama.

The thematic content is encapsulated in Mr. Cruz’ lead ppg:

Of all the troubling aspects of the Obama presidency, none is more dangerous than the president’s persistent pattern of lawlessness, his willingness to disregard the written law and instead enforce his own policies via executive fiat….

This thesis is expanded throughout the piece, for example:

…There is no example of lawlessness more egregious than the enforcement – or nonenforcement – of the president’s signature policy, the Affordable Care Act. Mr. Obama has repeatedly declared that “it’s the law of the land.” Yet he has repeatedly violated ObamaCare’s statutory text…Not by going to Congress to change the text of the law, but through a blog post by an assistant secretary at Treasury announcing the change….

None of these assertions are really open to conjecture as far as we are concerned.

It’s, as they say, an open and shut case – Mr. Obama is acting as if he is Señor Jefe of some Third World pineapple plantation government.

Mr. Cruz would not be allowed enough space in the WSJ to adequately deal with even the most egregious abuses of power in which this administration is engaged.

There simply aren’t enough column inches.

Despite the tautological truthfulness of Cruz’ recitation of charges, the subtext is ignored and we find that far more interesting and probative with regard to the serious matter he raises.

Not knowing the mindset of the WSJ’s editorial staff it would be fool-hearty to assume what might motivate the newspaper to publish Cruz’ devastating bill of particulars.

Perhaps they think, as does this writer, that the critique is spot on, perhaps they feel that they should curry favor with this fast-rising Senator from Texas who has obvious presidential aspirations and many of the tools required to make that a reality.

It really doesn’t matter though because the very presence of this nifty little bomblet is in an odd way more revelatory of the trouble at 1211 Avenue of the Americas rather than that which is percolating over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

We maintain this to be the case because – assuming there is some affinity between the sentiments expresses by the Senator and WSJ management – what one hand of the Journal giveth the other taketh away.

And it’s the matter of the “takeaway” which is of prime importance here.

The Journal has been on record for a long time now as being in favor of some form of amnesty for illegal Mexican aliens. Though they might call them undocumented, hard-working, salt of the earth people yearning for freedom, in reality they are lawbreaking, low skilled, often illiterate pawns of a rapacious crony capitalism.

These mooch faux-capitalists seek through amnesty to depress the wages of legal American workers, also, though they don’t need them, they would certainly like access to impoverished, ignorant and compliant workers whom they can mold in whatever form they might require.

Here we might direct you to picture the Service Employees International Union, whose operation depends on newly minted proles with strong backs who don’t talk back.

Big Agra is much the same in its desire for low skilled, poorly educated desperate people to pick the crops, because as u have been taught, “Americans aren’t interested in that kind of work.”

This is of course correct, no one in their right mind is going to engage in backbreaking labor at 9 bucks an hour just to please Wall Street.

Offered a market driven  wage in a labor pool which is not flooded with the illegal effluvia of the Third World there would be more than enough applicants.

That is unless the assertion here is that there are some jobs which require slave labor, an argument which we thought was settled in the negative, in a rather nasty affair which took place about 150 years ago.

Why bring up the case of the illegals?

Because it’s where the Journal and its kindred spirits are caught in an untenable dilemma of their own construction.

If the powers that be, which includes all of the usual suspects and also a substantial number of GOP types, including their most influential advisors, people such as Karl Rove, get their way – and they are going for the gold on this one – what will happen is as described below.

In some manner or form, “undocumented..wink wink…nod nod, workers” are granted some form of quasi-legal status. It may be something as simple as a legislative declaration that immigration laws will not be enforced [as opposed to Mr. Obama’s illegal approximation of same].

It could go much further however, if people like Boehner are allowed to bring the leadership’s legalization scheme to the floor, which will make the upwards of 12M [probably a lot more] illegals already here legal, but not citizens – recognizing them but not permitting them to vote – then things will turn ugly very quickly.

How long will it take for racialist lobby, think La Raza, MALDEF or Marxist advocacy groups, the ACLU or National Lawyers Guild, to bring suit on behalf of Rosario Galindo his girlfriend and three little bambinos, claiming that giving these people legal status but denying them to vote is unconstitutional?

How long would it take for the 9th Circuit Court to wade into the matter [48 hours max] and provide injunctive relief from the obvious oppression that denial of the vote would represent.

Whoops, just in time for 2014, how coincidental.

So, following the WSJ’s philosophy [again, we aren’t picking on the WSJ per se, it’s just that organization’s editorial advocacy is symbolic of where the GOP/Chamber of Commerce/Big Ag/Political Advisor Complex is on this matter] we go from a bad situation to one in which the nature of the American electorate is forever changed.

Do you think the left will give credit to The Journal, Boehner, Paul Ryan [sob, what a loss] and the rest for their act of beneficence?

Sorry pal, don’t you know that the GOP is inherently and incurably racist, misogynist and homophobic? Do you think that the left will pass up the opportunity to slam the Republicans in campaign commercials alleging that, “sure, these bastards wanted the sweat of your brow, but they don’t want you as part of their America.”

If you believe that the left would hold itself in check, then the moon really is made of cheese.

The newly minted, formerly illegal Mexican, citizens will overwhelmingly vote the straight Dem party ticket and they will be chauffeured to the polls just to make sure their vote is recorded at least once.

The road the new legalization advocates are rapidly heading down is one where the genuine Obama will be followed by another one at least a reckless and one in which both houses of Congress will be in the hands of the left.

That complete control may not last in perpetuity, but given the havoc that only two years of Obama/Reid/Pelosi’s “United Rule” caused, imagine the wreckage that 8 or 12 or…..years could bring.

That damage would be permanent…irrevocable.

The claim to government freebies would soar out of control faster than you can say Speedy Gonzalez. The market [much to the chagrin of the Wall Streters who support this scheme] would instantly tank and real citizens would nervously be breaking out their ARs.

This isn’t hyperbole. What these self-important nincompoops are up to will bring about perpetual totalitarianism, which of course will most likely breed a revolution, the likes of which no nation has ever seen.

By comparison, the Siege of Stalingrad will be a walk in the park and do you think that Vlad Putin, Khomenei and the sawed off N. Korean dog-eaters won’t take advantage of the situation?

Listen up boys and girls, there is only one thing that can stop this looming catastrophe and that is becoming politically active, not through the normal way, you know, “come on down to the GOP Central Committee and help us stuff envelopes for more of the same, hey, we’ll buy you a pizza”

Melt the phone lines, flood the faxes, crash the servers, if necessary peacefully march on DC, shut the MF down.

We don’t have to take this.

We shouldn’t simply stand by while a spineless bunch of cowards –  yeah Boehner you are number on the list, your putty-faced idiot alter-ego, the minority leader of the Senate, is a close second – sell the country out and for what?

All this has been set in motion by one thing, the GOP not wanting to be called bad names.

News Flash – you guys can’t escape that, you have already blown whatever credibility you had, which wasn’t much to start with. People who should naturally support you already hate your guts, there is no reason why the left shouldn’t join in the merriment.

Perhaps these clowns deserve the Amerika they are now feverishly trying to mint, but the rest of us don’t.

How about this Mr. Speaker all of us will  chip together and fly you to the banana republic of your choice, one way. Give it a try and get back to us, in the meantime put up or get out of Dodge, because sooner or later you will be hitting the road anyway, what you have set in motion guarantees that.

Disclaimer – we are NOT advocating a violent or non-violent overthrow of the government, nor are we encouraging illegal activity. What we are doing is insisting on our right to petition the government along with the right to replace it if necessary in a manner fully consistent with the Constitution.

If you don’t like it, take it up with Mr. Madison, assuming you can stop him spinning in the grave long enough to pop the question.

If that does happen, don’t expect to walk away without at least bloody nose…


©2014 All rights reserved.





Chuck Schumer, Portrait of a Fascist – Occupied California – January 27, 2014 – Ok, we are tired of pulling punches in the face of the outrageous anti-Constitutional ravings of the Democrat Party’s leadership.

It’s time to deal with this head-on…break out the lead pipes, blowtorches and pliers.

The most recent example of the increasingly hysterical tone of this extremist advocacy was a speech delivered at John Podesta’s Center For American Progress by Senator Charles Schumer [D-NY] who is suggesting “campaign reform” as a method of crushing political dissent, namely the Tea Party.

The so-called “Center for American Progress” [CAP] is a collectivist think tank founded by John Podesta, former Chief of Staff for Bill Clinton. Hooking up early with Barack Obama, CAP has served as the de-facto hiring center for the administration.

Podesta himself was recently added to the Obama’s team of advisors, charged with the duty of righting Team O’s leaking ship of state.

Podesta is a hired thug and perhaps the real architect of the Clinton administration’s “politics of personal destruction.” He served as counsel to Senator Pat “Leaky” Leahy and helped him advance what has been the wholesale takeover of the Federal Judiciary by activist judges who piss on the Constitution.

He has long been a proponent of Democrat presidents shattering the separation of powers concept and usurping legislative and judicial authority through the use of executive orders and other strong-arm tactics. [Some of the above sourced at John Podesta, Discover the Networks]

Witness, “I have a pen and a phone.”

So it was altogether fitting that Schumer outline his anti-Democratic philosophy at CAP.

A few quotes should provide the flavor of his diatribe.

They’ve won elections, stymied Democratic priorities and taken a sledgehammer to programs that are important to tens of millions of Americans…Our very electoral structure has been rigged to favor tea party candidates in Republican primaries, even when the district or the state may not be that red.

His goal here?

To destroy his political opponents by mandating “open elections,” thus denying the right of Republicans to choose Republicans as candidates for political office.

This would prevent a hard-right candidate from gaining office with only 22 percent of the vote. It would force the most extreme candidates in Republican districts to move closer to the middle to pick up more moderate Republicans and independents in order to be one of the top two vote-getters and enter the run off.

This is a proven strategy, witness California where candidates are no longer forced to identify their party affiliation, with the two who garner the most votes then having a run-off for the seat. This has resulted in a California legislature where Republicans are a non-entity since they have no effective vote. Thus there are no checks and balances to prevent Democrats from doing whatever they wish, which is a lot, none of it good.

Schumer believes in the Leviathan totalitarian state, he speaks of it with the kind of reverential tone, that most should find chilling.

“Their mantra – dramatically shrink government and our problems will end’ — is the fundamentally false…” [quotes source at, Susan Jones, Schumer Suggests ‘Electoral Reform’ As Way to ‘Lessen the Grip of the Tea Party’, CNS News]

Last time we checked the Constitution was promulgated upon the principle of limited government with political authority residing in, of and by the people.

Heard enough?

We think not.

Schumer and his ilk deserve the Fascist appellation, they and their party have earned it because despite the rhetoric it’s he, his progenitors and his party buds who are the totalitarian minded racists.

They believe that only white upper crust radical Ivy League educated lawyers have the right to define the politics of minorities.

Those intrepid few who stray from the strict confines of this world, people such as Justice Clarence Thomas, former Bush AG Alberto R. Gonzales, Condoleezza Rice former representative J. C. Watts, judicial nominees Janice Rogers Brown, Michael Estrada, most recently the political prosecution of film maker Dinesh D’Souza and other have suffered the wrath of these people simply because their ideology differs from that which the Democrat Party has chosen for them. [some of above sourced at, John Fund, The War on Conservative Minorities, National Review]

Modern day members of the Democrat Party come by their biases naturally, since the Democrats have had a 150 year love affair with racial segregation. It was Democrat governors, mayors, police chiefs and other political animals who manned the instruments of oppressing blacks in the deep-South.

When you think of Jim Crow laws, think white racist Democrat – the now departed former Democrat Senator who held multiple positions of authority within that body – Senate Majority Whip, Senate Majority Leader and President pro tempore.

Byrd had previously been a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan.

Connecting the dots yet?

Good, but there’s more…

Today’s Democrat leaders ascribe to the Fascistic notion of state socialism through crony capitalism, with companies run by fat-cat Dems being singled out for government assistance. Here think Big Labor, teacher and public employee unions, Green Sector mavens, purveyors of fraudulent global warming junk science, etc.

Hitler liked his Krupp steel, Schumer, Obama and the rest love Solyndra, union bailouts and other fiscal rat-holes.

No my friends, despite the Democrat Party controlling the presidency, the senate, the media, the judiciary, the entertainment industry and the educational establishment, it isn’t enough.

Even though the Obama administration has used the Department of Justice, the IRS and other governmental centers of authority and power to crush any opposition, it just isn’t enough.

Even though this administration is wildly violative of the rule of law already, it isn’t enough.

People like Charles “Chuck-You” [thank you Mark Levin] Schumer and his bund of brothers and sisters will settle for nothing but total control.

The content of Schumer’s speech at CAP should chill Americans to their marrow. It’s a sure prescription for total central control, an all powerful state run by condescending, corrupt schmucks such as Schumer.

If that’s what you want, then keep your fat ass on the couch; save your bitching until Big Chuckie and the Blue Helmets come knocking at your door.

Don’t you dare say you weren’t warned.

©2014 All rights reserved.